TWitter
Facebook
RSS
Manhattan 2150
May 15th, 2010
Posted in:
3D Digital paintingsTags:
city, Dylan Cole, manhattan, metropolisFollow us:
Twitter, Facebook, RSSRelated posts:
this post? Please share:
Like or comment on this post using Facebook...
12 COMMENTS / TRACKBACKS - (Trackback-URL)
Neat conceptual photo of what New York will look like by 2150 if we don’t blow ourselves up.
Benjamin Koshkin
That is a really neat, but kind of scary, conceptual photo. I love it!
Sure, because globalist United Nations plans exist for people who are now living in the countryside to be forced to move to more densely populated areas so populations can be tracked and controlled more efficiently. See http://newsofinterest.tv/video_pages_flash/politics/misc_neocon_globalist/obama_asked_cfr_nau.php
Chances are dwindling that there will even be a 2150.
this would be more successful if you posted a photo of manhattan now.
God, Edward. You’re a moron. Fantastic drawing, btw.
Hey Franco, you’re an idiot.
Edward, I completely agree, it’s also so we can no longer be self sufficient. The more our government supposedly “gives” us the more they want in return, such as complete dependence.
Cool photo but I think it’d be optimistic to say that’s what New York will be in 40 years. That’s some extreme growth for a few decades. A cool, if intimidating concept.
Also some of you should get off the internet every once in a while and detoxify your brain of these conspiracy theories.
I’m trying to figure out how this would ‘fit’ in the real geography of the area. Manhattan is too thin and is the NJ and Staten Island in the distance? Or is this after global flooding and the Hudson has swallowed up most of the island?
It work better if there where also recognizable landmarks like Central Park. (Which the way its endowed and how it enhances the property values of the ‘rich and famous’ is unlikely to ever be paved over)
I agree completely with Steve. Wtf part of Manhattan is this looking at?
What boroughs are in the distance? Where are the bridges and major landmarks?
Don’t get me wrong, it’s a cool picture, but does not correlate to the correct geography of Manhattan.
@lawanda
What do you mean by that?
@johnny
Alot of things can change from now to the future if this picture is a possibility of that.
This is an awesome picture.
man all of you are arguing bout’ the photo that you don’t reconize it for it’s own unique stature…besides what does art have anything to with geography anyway?!? it’s about what the artist feels and what he’s put into this piece. don’t judge things by what you know.