32 Amazing Digital Art Ladies
About the artworks
Above digital art painting by Polish artist Marek Okon.
Love this collection? Share it!
Related Posts
Your thoughts?
Leave a comment using Facebook Comments, or our own comment form to the right.
You can also join the discussion on our Facebook page!
Coolvibe on Facebook
Very nice collection! Some real gems in there and I love the various styles represented. A very appealing variety.
About the one with the girl with the bomb strapped to her, I’ve seen it around before, and I have to say, it’s in such poor taste. Oh yeah, “war is hell” and blah blah blah. The little girl is offering a flower but is actually a human bomb. That’s disgusting enough. But artist just had to draw in her little ass didn’t he? It’s an example of the hyper sexed and hyper violent extremes of today’s entertainment media. Without class or substance, is there anywhere else to go?
Got to agree with Sak about the hyper sexed point s/he made (agree with his/her other points too). I’m tired of seeing disembodied women described as ‘ladies’. These aren’t pictures of ladies, they’re pictures of breasts, buttocks and crotches. There’s more to women than that. There’s no doubt you’re talented, but your interpretation of what makes a woman is somewhat dubious, I feel.
True. Its very popular as these works of art are from 20+ artists. See many of their other art here: http://coolvibe.com/category/conceptart/
TO: SAK
The best art makes a statement to the viewer, and is not meant for entertainment purposes alone.
War on the other hand is, as we can all agree, poor taste at is very worst.
Other than the ways man finds to destroy our planet, there’s nothing quite so horrific as the ways man can invent to destroy his own kind.
I put those statements in that order because I cannot paint, so I use words to express that our planet would be better off without mankind. I’ve been in a war, and this piece doesn’t *begin* to portray it’s true face.
To me this piece is expressing just how ugly, dehumanizing,….etc. war is.
Which is exactly the artist’s point….no? So in your case at least…it worked.
TO: SAK
The best art makes a statement to the viewer, and is not meant for entertainment purposes alone.
War on the other hand is, as we can all agree, poor taste at is very worst.
Other than the ways man finds to destroy our planet, there’s nothing quite so horrific as the ways man can invent to destroy his own kind.
I put those statements in that order because I cannot paint, so I use words to express that our planet’s survival would be infinitely better off without mankind. I’ve been in a war, and this piece doesn’t *begin* to portray it’s true face.
But it does a good job of expressing just how ugly, dehumanizing,….etc. war is.
Which is exactly the artist’s point….no? So in your case at least…it worked.
Take a look at some actual war photographs on the web if you’re still not sure.
more I never see. great! thanks for share!
While I do agree that most art, especially in this medium, is “hyper sexed,” I don’t agree that this piece takes on that aspect. Yes, war has been overdone; and so has scantily clad women. But I see this as an interpretation of the natural human ability to only see what is on the surface.
Like Denny, I too have been to war, and anyone who has been to Iraq knows the intensity that goes into picking a suicide bomber from a crowd: dressed in their finest garb (during the earlier part of Operation Iraqi Freedom), bulges where there shouldn’t be any (difficult to see under a long robe), and the bomber’s ability to not appear out of the ordinary amongst the others completing their daily tasks. But this piece is not about the rights and wrongs of war. It is about the conflict of perspectives.
The soldiers obviously do not notice the bomb that would be plainly visible beneath the vaguely transparent gown. Their eyes, which should be searching for possible threats, embrace the rareness of the “beauty” in a broken city (and perhaps with not-so-innocent thoughts). The threat they are searching for has escaped them. Even as viewers, our eyes immediately slide past the dirtied, worn feet, and over the unkempt, filthy hair; we immediately see the half-revealed buttocks.
I agree that this piece might not reveal the true face of any current or recent war; but I could see this as a possibility. A woman, who’s entire family may have died as a result to war—mother, father, husband, children—imagines a plan to exact her revenge. While most of her other belongings were destroyed to fire or the collapse of her building, she scrounges up the nicest article she can find in the piles of rubble. She pleads with the opposition to this invading force, asking them for the opportunity to release her pain. She finds a yellow flower, still untouched despite the destruction surrounding it; she thinks it ironic, yet fitting. She walks to the nearest group of soldiers, the nearest tank. They watch. She watches. We watch.
…and yet none of us see the true threat: closed-minded perspectives.
My hat’s off to you Marek Okon.
i dont agree with the assessments being made about the girl with the bomb. while i do agree with the sex part. this depicts how warfare is being fought. look at solomia or africa were they send 8-15yr. out into the battlefield with AK-47′s to be nothing but cannon fodder. so a little girl walking up to a tank with a flower strapped with bombs is more realistic on what is going on in the world of today than a dressed soldier in a uniform as warfare in cities are no longer fought they way they are now like they were in 1940′s